Foot and ankle society aofas anklehindfoot score and subjectively using the medical outcomes study, shortform, 36item questionnaire. Construct validity was evaluated with spearmans correlation coefficient when comparing sefas with faos, sf36, and eq5d, content validity by calculating floor and ceiling effects, testretest reliability with. Reliability and validity of the dutch version of the foot and. Diagnosis and treatment of lisfranc injuries of the foot presented to. Thus, we sought to determine whether a statistically significant correlation exists between the results of the. Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of a selfreported.
The foot and ankle milestone project the milestones are designed only for use in evaluation of the fellow in the context of their participation in acgmeaccredited residency or fellowship programs. One of the most widely used pro measures for foot and ankle conditions is the american orthopedic foot and ankle society score aofas. The vasfa is widely used to evaluate foot and ankle problems from the patientsperspective12. Patients with rheumatoid arthritis seemed to have similar selfreported foot and ankle scores but possibly lower eq5d and sf 36 scores. Short form36 sf36 and aofas anklehindfoot scale scores were similar for both groups at all time points up to 2 years.
The ankle hindfoot, midfoot, metatarsophalangeal mtpinterphalangeal ip for the hallux, and mtpip for the lesser toes. Foot and ankle ability measures rehabmeasures database. A prospective observational study of 91 consecutive patients 125 foot operations undergoing hallux valgus surgery at an orthopaedic hospital. In the published data, although reported for other orthopedic and traumatic foot and ankle disorders 9, 12, 27, 30, we could not find a study that compared the aofas ankle hindfoot score for the ankle and hindfoot and the sf 36 in the evaluation of achilles tendon percutaneous repair. The aofasah score and sf 36 score were used to evaluate ankle function. Patient related outcome measures proms for foot and ankle.
Patients with rheumatoid arthritis seemed to have similar selfreported foot and ankle scores but possibly lower eq5d and sf36 scores. Foot pain has long been recognised as highly prevalent in. The relation between the objective aofas and subjective sf36 results showed a significant correlation pearsons correlation coefficient between the physical functioning r 0. Developed by rand in 1992, the sf 36 is a 36 question survey derived from the medical outcomes study mos, a multiyear study to explain variations in patient outcomes. Assessing healthrelated quality of life in patients with. Reliability and validity of the foot and ankle outcome. Diagnosis and treatment of lisfranc injuries of the foot. Sf 36, the ankle osteoarthritis scale aos, the american orthopaedic foot and ankle society aofas ankle hindfoot score, and the foot function index ffi to determine their responsiveness and validity.
Foot and ankle ability measure faam, validity, reliability, short form 36 general health outcome sf 36. Recently, a comparison of the responsiveness of the manchesteroxford foot questionnaire moxfq with those of the american orthopaedic foot ankle society aofas, sf36, and euroqol eq5d assessments following foot or ankle surgery was published. The free information and calculation service, designed for orthopaedic surgeons, physicians, physical therapists, osteopaths, chiropractors and patients. Accordingly, an inclusion of healthy subjects for the validation of a foot and ankle score seems to be. A validated, dutch version of this instrument is currently not available. Validity and reliability of thai version of the foot and.
Ankle joint distraction arthroplasty for severe ankle. According to the cross cultural adaptation of selfreport measures guideline, the faos was. The relation between the objective aofas and subjective sf 36 results showed a significant correlation pearsons correlation coefficient between the physical functioning r 0. More extensive missing data leads to incomplete scoring of some subscales or summary scores. A second version was developed in 1996 sf36v2 to correct deficiencies identified in the original version. To determine testretest reliability, 60 randomly chosen patients completed the faos again 2. The sf361 was developed to survey health status in the medical outcomes study 5,6. The 36item short form sf36, euroqol fivedimension questionnaire eq5d5l, and foot and ankle ability measure faam are examples of commonly used hrqol surveys. Measures of foot function, foot health, and foot pain. Correlation of sf36 and sf12 component scores in patients with. Responsiveness and validity of the sf36, ankle osteoarthritis scale, aofas ankle hindfoot score, and foot function index in end stage ankle arthritis. The vas fa is computerized which enables faster evaluation than sf36 or q. Creating such a universal selfreport measure would improve researchers and clinicians ability to compare effectiveness of relevant treatments as well as provide a tool with which to. The introduced score is the first validated on sf36, subjective, vas based outcome score for foot and ankle.
Visualanaloguescale foot and ankle vas fa were obtained from a group of voluntary subjects. A valid dutch version of this instrument is currently not available. The 36 item short form sf 36, euroqol fivedimension questionnaire eq5d5l, and foot and ankle ability measure faam are examples of commonly used hrqol surveys. Twentyfive patients were recruited at a tertiary referral foot and ankle practice. Pdf comparison of generic, musculoskeletalspecific, and foot. Responsiveness and minimally important change for the. In the published data, although reported for other orthopedic and traumatic foot and ankle disorders 9, 12, 27, 30, we could not find a study that compared the aofas ankle hindfoot score for the ankle and hindfoot and the sf36 in the evaluation of achilles tendon percutaneous repair. In addition, the sf36 questionnaire and the jssf scale scoring form. Jul 28, 2008 respondents with foot pain scored lower on all domains of the sf 36 after adjustment for age, sex and bmi.
Is there a relation between aofas anklehindfoot score and sf36. Component summary mcs of the short form36 sf36 questionnaire had a higher rate of. Validity and reliability of a selfadministered foot. In 14 patients 21% randomized to receive 2 screws, the surgeons decided intraoperatively to use only 1 screw because of fracture size and configuration. A second version was developed in 1996 sf 36v2 to correct deficiencies identified in the original version. The sf361 was designed for use in clinical practice and research, health policy evaluations and general population surveys. The milestones provide a framework for the assessment of the. Strengthening the muscles that support your lower leg, foot, and ankle will help keep your ankle joint stable. Responsiveness of the foot function index, aofas clinical. Pdf is there a relation between aofas anklehindfoot score. To determine testretest reliability, 60 randomly chosen patients completed the faos again 2 to 6 days after the first administration. The validity and reliability of vasfa was reported, and the process of validating it against the sf36 was completed 12.
The sf 361 was developed to survey health status in the medical outcomes study 5,6. Jun 11, 20 the foot and ankle outcome score faos is a patientreported questionnaire measuring symptoms and functional limitations of the foot and ankle. Prevalence and correlates of foot pain in a population. For example, sixlevel response scales were reduced to fivelevel. The time needed for evaluating the scores was significantly lower for vas fa than for sf36 and q onewayanova, p conclusions the introduced score is the first validated on sf36, subjective, vas based outcome score for foot and ankle.
Foot pain affects nearly one in five of people in the community, is associated with increased age, female sex, obesity and pain in other body regions, and has a significant detrimental impact on healthrelated quality of life. Patients with end stage ankle arthritis were recruited into a prospective multicenter. The vas is the best pain score and the sf36 the best general health. American orthopaedic foot and ankle society aofas ankle.
This study compared the responsiveness of the foot function index ffi, american orthopaedic foot and ankle society aofas clinical rating systems, and medical outcomes study short form36 sf36 in patients with foot and ankle surgery. Results the mean aofas ankle hindfoot score was 72 range 17100, sd 18 points, and the mean maryland foot score was 80 range 35100, sd. The sf36 is a generic patientreported outcome measure that quantifies health status and measures healthrelated quality of life. Pdf the short form36 sf36 is the most widely used healthrelated qualityoflife measure in research to date. Responsiveness of the foot function index, aofas clinical rating systems, and sf36 after foot and ankle surgery nelson f.
Objectives the american orthopaedic foot and ankle society aofas ankle hindfoot scale is among the most commonly used instruments for measuring outcome of treatment in patients who sustained a complex ankle or hindfoot injury. The american orthopaedic foot and ankle society ankle. Foot and ankle surgery accounts for approximately one fifth of orthopaedic practice and has a high level of patient dissatisfaction. The manchesteroxford foot questionnaires moxfqs are 16item patient reported outcome pro measures developed and validated for. According to the cross cultural adaptation of selfreport measures guideline, the. Is there a relation between aofas anklehindfoot score and. No difference in groups in sf36, smfa or final satisfaction ratings lower reoperation rate in primary. The sf 36 is a generic patientreported outcome measure that quantifies health status and measures healthrelated quality of life.
Prevalence and correlates of foot pain in a populationbased. Chapter 7 patientreported outcome measures in hallux. Sf36, the ankle osteoarthritis scale aos, the american orthopaedic foot and ankle society aofas ankle hindfoot score, and the foot function index ffi to determine their responsiveness and validity. The faam was developed to provide a universal measure of change in physical functioning of patients with leg, ankle, and foot musculoskeletal disorders. Insert relevant presenter information calibri 16pt. Conclusion foot pain affects nearly one in five of people in the community, is associated with increased age, female sex, obesity and pain in other body regions, and has a significant detrimental impact on healthrelated quality of life. Respondents are asked to answer items referring to the past 4 weeks. Aim is to translate and culturally adapt the dutch version of the faos and to investigate internal consistency, validity, repeatability and responsiveness.
Validity and reliability of a selfadministered foot evaluation. We examined four commonly used scores, the sf 36, the ankle osteoarthritis scale aos, the american orthopaedic foot and ankle society aofas ankle hindfoot score, and the foot function index ffi to determine their responsiveness and validity. These selfadministered pros assesses how foot problems impair healthrelated. The foot and ankle outcome score faos is a patientreported questionnaire measuring symptoms and functional limitations of the foot and ankle. Learning objectives the continuum of outcomes following. Patients with end stage ankle arthritis were recruited into a prospective multicenter cohort study and baseline and one year. Sf36 mental component summary mcs bc foot and ankle. Contact qualitymetric incorporated for information regarding licensing fees for your institution. In the published data, although reported for other orthopedic and traumatic foot and ankle disorders 9, 12, 27, 30, we could not find a study that compared the aofas anklehindfoot score for the ankle and hindfoot and the sf36 in the evaluation of achilles tendon percutaneous repair. Medical outcomes study short form 36 rehabmeasures database. Pdf is there a relation between aofas anklehindfoot. Reliability and validity of the dutch version of the foot.
We examined four commonly used scores, the sf36, the ankle osteoarthritis scale aos, the american orthopaedic foot and ankle society aofas ankle hindfoot score, and the foot function index ffi to determine their responsiveness and validity. The aofasah score and sf36 score were used to evaluate ankle function. The manchesteroxford foot questionnaire moxfq is a validated 16item, patientreported outcome measure for evaluating outcomes of foot or ankle surgery. Construct validity was evaluated with spearmans correlation coefficient when comparing sefas with faos, sf36, and eq5d, content validity by calculating floor. Stretching the muscles that you strengthen is important for restoring range of motion and preventing injury. The sf36 scores of our group did not significantly differ from the actual normative data of the healthy german population. All procedures were performed by subspecialtytrained foot and ankle surgeons. Pdf concurrent validity of the foot health status questionnaire.
Outcome of surgically treated intraarticular calcaneus. Sf36 and the other scores sefas had no floor and ceiling effects good testretest reliability good internal consistency good responsiveness validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the foot and ankle score sefas coster m, karlsson m, nilsson ja, carlsson a. Sf 361 the validated german version of the 36 item shortform sf 361 was used 5. It was hypothesised that, because the moxfqs conceptual framework particularly addresses pain and function in relation to footankle problems, correlations would be large r. The sf36 yields eight scale scores and two summary scores. The sf 36 allows complete scoring for patients with a limited number of missing items. The american orthopedic foot and ankle score aofas pro. The anklehindfoot, midfoot, metatarsophalangeal mtpinterphalangeal ip for the hallux, and mtpip for the lesser toes. However, the original validation process for the sf36 also included healthy subjects. Medical outcomes study, shortform, 36item questionnaire sf36 questionnaire. Sf361 the validated german version of the 36item shortform sf361 was used 5.
It consists of a patientreported and a physicianreported part. Developed by rand in 1992, the sf36 is a 36question survey derived from the medical outcomes study mos, a multiyear study to explain variations in patient outcomes. It combines a clinicianreported and a patientreported part. Early detection of the disease is critical as the prevention of foot dorsiflexion. Developed in 1994, the clinicianbased aofas covers four different regions of the foot. Ankle joint distraction arthroplasty for severe ankle arthritis. The medical outcome study short form sf questionnaire sf36 is the most used gen. Dec 15, 2015 the faam was developed to provide a universal measure of change in physical functioning of patients with leg, ankle, and foot musculoskeletal disorders. Introduction the american orthopaedic foot and ankle society aofas anklehindfoot score is among the most commonly used instruments for measuring the outcome of treatment in patients who sustained a complex ankle or hindfoot injury.
The vas score was used to evaluate the degree of pain. Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of a self. Sf36 scores were correlated with the values of the maryland foot score and aofas ankle hindfoot scale spearman correlation coef. The sample included 93 patients with foot and ankle disorders who were asked to complete two questionnaires. Low hrqol has been associated with higher rates of hospital admission and mortality in patients with diabetes. The manchesteroxford foot questionnaires moxfqs are 16item patient reported outcome pro measures developed and validated for use in clinical trials involving foot surgery. Concurrent validity of the foot health status questionnaire and study short form 36 for measuring the healthrelated quality of life in patients with foot. The clinical outcome of the patient was determined at the point just prior to beginning brace use and then again after a minimum of 3.
Is there a relation between aofas anklehindfoot score and sf. Keeping these muscles strong can relieve foot and ankle pain and prevent further injury. Surgical technique the patient was placed supine on the operating table. Respondents with foot pain scored lower on all domains of the sf36 after adjustment for age, sex and bmi. Foot and ankle ability measure faam, validity, reliability, short form 36 general health outcome sf36. The sf 361 was designed for use in clinical practice and research, health policy evaluations and general population surveys. Journal of foot and ankle research research open access. Thus, we sought to determine whether a statistically. No data have been reported on the ability of the global foot and ankle modules to detect change. Objectives the american orthopaedic foot and ankle society aofas anklehindfoot scale is among the most commonly used instruments for measuring outcome of treatment in patients who sustained a complex ankle or hindfoot injury.
1025 899 745 1240 624 571 697 710 898 209 650 894 1519 1380 1095 846 111 483 823 747 1033 1228 1326 1060 1312 42 897 1200 1138 1068 915 680 258 1402 1335 493 133 685 1330 544 614 1276 1364 1346 957